An attempt to get long-stalled reforms to
VA Choice in the spending omnibus this week broke down because of
opposition from House Minority Leader Nancy Pelosi (D-Calif.), once
again putting on hold legislation that would substantially open up
private care to veterans.
VA Choice is currently limited to veterans who live more than 40 miles
away from the nearest VA medical center or who would have to wait more
than 30 days before they can get an appointment. Under the proposed
reforms, veterans would not have to "enroll" in a community care program
like with previous programs. All veterans would be able to work with
their provider to determine the best way for them to get care based on
their clinical need.
The reforms to the Choice program, which would hold VA clinics to
certain codified care standards and let private and VA providers decide
where veterans should seek treatment, were ultimately combined with a
mandatory infrastructure review of VA clinics and expansion of home
caregiving options for veterans.
Congressional leaders are in final negotiations over the $1.2 trillion
appropriations deal that must pass by Friday at midnight to avert a
government shutdown. The VA legislation, which was rapidly finalized
over the weekend and has not yet been released, was dropped from the
omnibus on Monday due to strong opposition from Pelosi, according to
several aides from the White House, Senate and House.
"What we are after is getting patients to care, period." House VA
Committee's health chair Rep. Brad Wenstrup (R-Ohio) said. "And if it's
within the walls of the VA, and available, and the best thing for the
patient, good. But one of the things I've been fighting for, my
preference, is that primary care doctor who has a patient makes the
decision on specialty care."
But a Democratic aide said on Tuesday the proposal failed to meet the
House Democrats' goal of consolidating the "VA's multiple
care-in-the-community programs into one seamless, understandable and
easy-to-use program that safeguards VA's role as veterans' chief
advocate, partner and coordinator of care."
"This proposal fails that test by removing congressional oversight on
VA's inadequate infrastructure, creating uncertainty with VA's budget
and opening the floodgates to privatizing VA's mental health services
and beyond," the aide said. "It won't reduce wait times and won't make
the VA easier to use."
House VA Committee Chair Phil Roe (R-Tenn.) spoke with Pelosi late
Tuesday afternoon in a last-ditch effort to win her support for the
overall package. He argued that for real reform, the infrastructure
review and caregiving provisions needed to pass along with the Choice
reforms.
Negotiations had reached a pitch over the weekend, Roe said, but House
Democrats didn't come on board with the compromise that had finally been
hammered out between the House, Senate and the White House.
On Monday, a coalition of veterans service organizations came out with
their endorsement of the package, including the VA Choice reforms that
have fueled controversy over the past few months as the Senate, White
House and VA wrangled over how they would decide when VA clinics should
release veterans to care.
Pelosi's opposition is the latest roadblock to VA Choice reforms that
have been subject to months of policy negotiations and political
wrangling since December.
Sen. Jerry Moran (R-Kan.), an appropriator for the VA, had not only come
out against the Senate VA Committee's own legislation, he also issued
his own alternative bill along with Sen. John McCain (R-Ariz.). As
negotiators worked to work through the differences between the competing
bills, Moran demanded statutory clarification of the standards VA
clinics must meet in order to provide the care for veterans.
The White House backed Moran's demands on access to care standards.
Moran and the Senate VA Committee reached a compromise agreement, even
as House Democrats worried that it might hasten privatization of the VA
health system.
But at least some veterans service organizations have endorsed the final
legislative package backed by both parties of the Senate VA Committee,
the Trump administration and House Republicans.
In their Monday letter to congressional leadership urging passage of the
legislation, eight veterans service organization executive directors
said they support the bill's "proposed creation of a new, consolidated
community care program based on integrated networks of VA and community
providers" as a "balanced approach to ensuring timely access to all
enrolled veterans, while continuing to strengthen the VA health care
system that millions of veterans choose and rely on."
Moran also endorsed the legislation.
"The Choice bill as it came out of the veterans committee was amended in
ways that we had recommended, that I support, and when that occurred I
became a supporter of Choice and community care, and I am anxious for
the bill to be enacted into law," Moran told Modern Healthcare on
Tuesday.
Moran's office issued a statement expressing disappointment from "the
idea that the minority in the House would obstruct meaningful
legislation to support our nation's veterans by refusing to include
bipartisan reforms to the VA" in the omnibus.
House Democrats hit back.
"If Republicans and the White House really wanted an agreement, they
would have asked House Democrats for our priorities before Saturday
night at the 11th hour," the Democratic aide said.
Senate lawmakers on Wednesday were still at odds over how much the VA
should invest in Choice rather than the existing health system.
"I am not in favor of privatization, I have heard from every (veterans
service organization) but one that they are not in favor of
privatization, but I see privatization written all over this budget,"
the Senate VA committee's ranking member Jon Tester (D-Mont.) said
during a hearing Wedneday.
VA Secretary Dr. David Shulkin testified at the hearing and was blunt
about the challenge in the task to build up the VA health system while
also expanding Choice.
"We are trying to balance an investment in VA to make it stronger
system, and at same time we're trying to give vets a choice for another
system," Shulkin said.
The secretary also acknowledged the problems Choice providers have had
getting reimbursed from various third-party payers, and said that he is
fast-tracking payments to providers owed the most by the VA |
|