California and the Trump administration
have been warring over immigration for more than a year and, on
Wednesday, that battle shifted to the courts.
U.S. Attorney General Jeff Sessions slammed California and its stance on
illegal immigration in a Sacramento speech to formally announce the
federal government’s lawsuit against California, Gov. Jerry Brown and
Xavier Becerra, the state’s attorney general.
“California, we have a problem. A series of actions and events has
occurred that directly and adversely impact the work of our federal
officers,” Sessions told a group assembled for a law enforcement event.
To Libby Schaaf, the Oakland mayor who recently warned her community of
immigration raids, Sessions said this: “How dare you. How dare you
needlessly endanger the lives of law enforcement just to promote your
radical open borders agenda.”
Reaction to the pointed speech varied, depending on the respondent’s
stance on immigration, but language from all sides was strong.
Gov. Brown said Sessions was acting “more like Fox News than a law
enforcement officer” and added that the Trump administration was “full
of liars.”
The lawsuit
In the lawsuit filed Tuesday in federal court in Sacramento, the Justice
Dept. is challenging three California laws — the “California Values Act”
(SB 54), the “Workplace Raid” law (AB 450), and the “Detention Review”
law (AB 103).
The California Values Act, which took effect Jan. 1, limits cooperation
between local law enforcement and federal immigration authorities,
including sharing information about criminals in custody unless the
person in question has been convicted of certain serious crimes. Passed
in reaction to the Trump administration’s tough talk on immigration and
his order to broaden deportations, the law essentially establishes
California as the nation’s first sanctuary state.
The Dept. of Justice lawsuit seeks to allow police in California to tell
federal agents when immigrants are released from custody and to share
other information about those people. It also would allow law
enforcement in California to transfer immigrants directly into federal
custody without a warrant.
The Workplace Raid law forbids employers from cooperating with federal
immigration officials and requires them to give a heads-up to their
workforce before immigration agents arrive for an inspection. Business
owners can be fined $2,000 to $10,000 for failing to comply.
“Just imagine if a state passed a law forbidding employers from
cooperating with OSHA in ensuring workplace safety. Or the EPA, looking
for a polluter. That would obviously be absurd,” Sessions said. “But it
would be no different in principle from this new law enacted by
California.”
Among other things, the federal lawsuit seeks to allow California
business owners to cooperate with federal agents, including sharing
employee records without a judicial order.
The Detention Review law allows California officials to inspect federal
facilities in the state where immigrants are being detained on
immigration-related issues. The federal lawsuit seeks to strike down
that law.
“It’s refreshing”
Activists who want tougher immigration rules, tired of what they view as
liberal California laws, were thrilled with Sessions’ words. California
leaders, they said, have too long ignored federal rules on immigration
to help people who are living in the country illegally.
“It’s refreshing to hear an attorney general talk about upholding our
laws,” said Robin Hvidston, executive director of the Claremont-based We
the People Rising, an anti-illegal immigration group with members across
Southern California.
“It restores order and lawfulness to our state,” said Hvidston, also a
leader with the Texas-based Remembrance Project, a group that honors
those killed by people residing in the country illegally.
On Facebook, Assemblyman Travis Allen, a Republican gubernatorial
candidate from Huntington Beach, touted “We did it!! JUSTICE COMES TO
CALIFORNIA!”
Allen’s post late Tuesday garnered over 11,000 likes.
On Wednesday, some of Allen’s constituents went on line to react to
Session’s announcement with comments such as this from Inland Empire
resident Phyllis Gibson: “Never thought I would ever want to leave the
state I was born & raised in. But unless conservatives can gain control,
it will only get worse!”
New fears
But activists who support rights for immigrants and unauthorized
residents said Sessions’ speech, and the possibility that the federal
lawsuit could invalidate California’s immigration statutes, stirred
fears in immigrant communities. They said many families include members
with mixed legal status, and that those families could be broken up by
tougher immigration enforcement.
“If they are successful in taking away these protections, it will affect
daily lives,” said Javier Hernandez, director of the Inland Coalition
for Immigrant Justice.
Hernandez ticked off each targeted law and defended them. The law that
allows California to evaluate how detention centers are run, for
example, is needed to provide transparency and protect those who are
being held solely for their immigration status. Last year, he noted,
three detainees died in the Adelanto Detention Facility, which is
operated by one of the country’s largest private prison companies.
“If the state of California wants to understand how detentions work, and
how people are being held in detention, we have every right to do so,”
Hernandez said.
Los Angeles Councilman Gil Cedillo said: “With their recent lawsuit,
Jeff Sessions and Donald Trump have declared war on California. What
they fail to realize is that we have rights too. Their legal threats
will not intimidate us.”
In Santa Ana, which has declared itself a “sanctuary city,” Councilman
David Benavides said the federal lawsuit could further isolate his
community and other immigrant communities across the state.
“Our community was already very fearful and concerned as a result of the
last election, when Donald Trump was elected,” Benavides said.
“This makes it more difficult for law enforcement officials to provide
safety because some people won’t want to call police.”
Law enforcement
Orange County Sheriff Sandra Hutchens, who has called for working more
closely with immigration agents, believes public safety is being
hindered by current state law, and the federal lawsuit could spark what
she views as necessary change.
“I really think we should be able to notify ICE of individuals who have
committed serious crimes and who are in our custody and let them know
when they are going to be released,” Hutchens said in an interview
Wednesday.
Currently, local law enforcement is not allowed to notify U.S.
Immigration and Customs Enforcement, known as ICE, when a criminal who
is an unauthorized immigrant has served his or her time and is about to
be released — though there are exceptions for immigrants who have
committed violent crimes and other serious offenses. Previously, local
law enforcement could tell ICE about the release of any immigrant from a
local jail. ICE agents could then be on hand to detain them again on an
immigration hold.
“This is tying my hands behind my back in areas where I think I should
notify ICE,” Hutchens said of the current state law. She said the
current law forces ICE agents to search and arrest immigrants in the
community, which can boost the odds of deportation for other
unauthorized immigrants who have not committed any other crime.
“Local law enforcement has no desire to enforce immigration law,”
Hutchens said. “However, we must have the ability to work with our
federal partners to remove dangerous criminals from our community.” |
|