A judge is weighing whether to
suppress the statement of a woman accused of leaking National Security
Agency secrets because federal agents did not warn her that her words
might be used against her and that she could wait for a lawyer.
Reality Winner, 25, admitted in the recorded statement that she smuggled
a classified document out of her office and mailed it to The Intercept,
an online news outlet. The Augusta Chronicle covered Tuesday's hearing,
and reports that parts of the recording were played in court.
Winner, who worked for the national security contractor Pluribus
International at Fort Gordon in Georgia, has pleaded not guilty to
violating the federal Espionage Act by leaking an NSA report about
Russian interference in the 2016 U.S. elections.
Defense attorney Matthew Chester says the statement should be suppressed
because federal agents intentionally chose not to read Winner her
Miranda rights out of fear that she would not talk if they did. "The law
says you don't get to do that," Chester said.
Miranda rights apply when a suspect is under arrest. FBI Special Agent
Justin Garrick contends that Winner should remain held without bond as a
menace to national security and a flight risk, but he said the 11 agents
who came to search Winner's home on June 3 had no intention of holding
her against her will until she willingly gave them probable cause to
arrest her.
Assistant U.S. Attorney Jennifer Solari said everything the agents did
that day proves she was not under arrest until after she gave her
statement. She said the agents were not outfitted in FBI gear, never
displayed weapons, and no one touched or intimidated her in any way.
But under cross-examination, Garrick acknowledged that Winner made the
incriminating statement after agents showed her a warrant to search her
body, and that all the agents at the scene were men. He also
acknowledged that he never told her she was free to leave, or that she
didn't need to repeatedly ask permission to move around within her home. |
|