President Trump on Saturday dismissed a
Democratic rebuttal to the GOP memo outlining government surveillance
abuses in the 2016 campaign as a “total political and legal bust,"
claiming that it only confirms the ”terrible things” that were done by
the nation’s intelligence agencies.
The rebuttal, written by Democrats on the House Intelligence Committee,
concluded that officials at the FBI and Justice Department “did not
abuse the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act (FISA) process, omit
material information, or subvert this vital tool to spy on the Trump
campaign.”
Democrats sought to counter claims made in a Republican memo released
this month that the FBI and DOJ relied on a Democrat-funded anti-Trump
dossier to ask the FISA court for a warrant to monitor Trump adviser
Carter Page.
Democrats have vehemently claimed that the Republican memo left out
important information.
Donald J. Trump
✔
@realDonaldTrump
The Democrat memo response on government surveillance abuses is a total
political and legal BUST. Just confirms all of the terrible things that
were done. SO ILLEGAL!
But Trump was unimpressed by the 10-page memo that resulted.
Adam Schiff
✔
@RepAdamSchiff
Wrong again, Mr. President. It confirms the FBI acted appropriately and
that Russian agents approached two of your advisors, and informed your
campaign that Russia was prepared to help you by disseminating stolen
Clinton emails. https://twitter.com/realdonaldtrump/status/967538684789739520
…
Ranking Democrat Adam Schiff, D-Calif., countered by saying it confirmed
that intelligence officials acted appropriately.
Democratic rebuttal to GOP FISA memo by Fox News on Scribd
Republicans had found that the DOJ and FBI left out Democratic National
Committee and Hillary Clinton campaign funding of the dossier, as well
as the anti-Trump motivations of author and former British spy
Christopher Steele, in its request for a warrant. Indeed, Republicans
have pointed to this as proof that intelligence agencies abused
surveillance powers.
Democrats' FISA memo claims multiple sources corroborated elements of
the anti-Trump Steele dossier; Catherine Herridge reports that the
Democratic memo appears to contradict testimony of James Comey.Video
Democratic memo: Sources corroborated Steele's reporting
The Democratic rebuttal, though it did not directly challenge some of
the key findings of the earlier one from Republicans, backed the FBI and
DOJ in their pursuit of that FISA warrant to surveil Page.
“In fact, DOJ and the FBI would have been remiss in their duty to
protect the country had they not sought a FISA warrant and repeated
renewals to conduct temporary surveillance of Carter Page, someone the
FBI assessed to be an agent of the Russian government,” the rebuttal
said, adding that the DOJ met the “rigor, transparency, and evidentiary
basis” needed to meet FISA’s probable-cause requirement.
Anti-Trump dossier raises questions about possible abuse of the FISA
court system by the DOJ and FBI; California Congressman Devin Nunes
explains at CPAC 2018.Video
Nunes speaks at CPAC about investigating use of FISA court
The memo said the Page surveillance warrant produced intelligence deemed
reliable, and sufficient to justify renewals every 90 days.
The rebuttal said the FBI had an "independent basis" for investigating
Page's motivations, and that he had been targeted for recruitment by the
Russians. It also claimed that the DOJ "repeatedly informed the Court
about Steele's background, credibility, and potential bias." And it
maintained that the Justice Department infomed the FISA court that
Steele had been hired by "politically motivated U.S. persons and
entities and that his research appeared intended for use "to discredit"
Trump's campaign.
The rebuttal added that the DOJ only made "narrow use" of information
from Steele's sources and that in later FISA renewals the DOJ provided
"additional information obtained through multiple independent sources"
that backed up Steele's reporting. It challenged the Republican
assertion that the FBI authorized payment to Steele, saying that it
neglected that the payment was canceled.
The memo, however, did not directly challenge the Republican assertion
that former FBI Deputy Director Andrew McCabe testified to the House
Committee that they would not have sought the Page surveillance warrant
had it not been for that infamous dossier.
The new memo also asserted that the dossier had been corroborated by
multiple sources. However, in June 2017 testimony to the Senate
Intelligence Committee, former FBI Director James Comey said the
opposite -- that three months after the warrant on Page had been granted
he still considered the dossier "unverified" and "salacious" when he
briefed incoming President Trump in January 2017 at Trump Tower.
The rebuttal was voted out of committee earlier this month but a redraft
was ordered after the White House demanded that sensitive information be
stripped out before the document be made public. The Justice Department
and FBI claimed the initial draft would reveal information about sources
and methods, ongoing investigations and other sensitive information.
Schiff said the minority's memo should "put to rest" any concerns about
conduct by the intelligence agencies.
His confidence notwithstanding, it seemed unlikely to mark an end to the
ongoing fight over the FISA application and the role of that infamous
dossier. Indeed, while the two parties clash over whether that dossier
was a primary or secondary driver of the surveillance application, the
newly declassified criminal referral for Christopher Steele from
Senators Chuck Grassley (R-Iowa) and Sen. Lindsey Graham (R-S.C.) said
the FBI and DOJ relied "heavily" on the controversial and salacious
document for the FISA application.
And upon the new memo's release, Republicans on the intel committee
responded with rebuttals to the rebuttal, providing more evidence that
this battle has legs. For instance, while the Democrats say that the
court was given information about the political motivations of Steele,
Republicans say that such a statement is "buried in a footnote" that
obscures rather than clarifies his motives.
“The American people now clearly understand that the FBI used political
dirt paid for by the Democratic Party to spy on an American citizen from
the Republican Party," Committee Chairman Devin Nunes, R-Calif. said in
a statement.
"Furthermore, the FISA court was misled about Mr. Page’s past
interactions with the FBI in which he helped build a case against
Russian operatives in America who were brought to justice. It defies
belief that the Department of Justice and FBI failed to provide
information to a secret court that they had provided to an open federal
court regarding their past interactions with Mr. Page," he said.
The White House called the rebuttal a "politically driven document" that
fails to answer the concerns raised by the Republican memo.
Donald J. Trump
✔
@realDonaldTrump
Dem Memo: FBI did not disclose who the clients were - the Clinton
Campaign and the DNC. Wow!
6:20 PM - Feb 24, 2018
62.5K
30.2K people are talking about this
Twitter Ads info and privacy
"As the Majority’s memorandum stated, the FISA judge was never informed
that Hillary Clinton and the DNC funded the dossier that was a basis for
the Department of Justice’s FISA application," Press Secretary Sarah
Sanders said in a statement.
"In addition, the Minority’s memo fails to even address the fact that
the Deputy FBI Director told the Committee that had it not been for the
dossier, no surveillance order would have been sought," she added.
Democrats have claimed that the original Republican memo was an effort
to attack FBI Director Robert Mueller’s investigation into alleged
Russian interference in 2016. Trump had previously said that the memo
"totally vindicates" him in the investigation.
Fox News’ Catherine Herridge, Jennifer Bowman and Jason Donner
contributed to this report.
Adam Shaw is a Politics Reporter and occasional Opinion writer for
FoxNews.com. He can be reached here or on Twitter: @AdamShawNY. |
|