Special Counsel Robert Mueller is
accused of acting in complete disregard for the law and must be removed.
And so, too, must his entire team.
There is devastating new evidence to suggest that Mueller and his staff
of lawyers improperly, if not illegally, obtained tens of thousands of
private documents belonging to President-elect Trump's Presidential
Transition Team (PTT). The material includes emails, laptops and cell
phones used by 13 PTT members.
Critically, a "significant volume of privileged material" was taken by
Mueller, according to the Trump transition lawyer, and then used by the
special counsel team in its investigation. Mueller's staff apparently
admits this egregious violation, which the law strictly forbids.
Under the law, the only remedy is Mueller's dismissal from the case.
The Records Are Private
The Presidential Transition Act states that all records of transition
operations are private and confidential.
On November 16, 2016, roughly ten days after Trump was elected
president, the Chief Records Officer of the U.S. Government sent a
letter to all federal agencies reminding them that "the materials that
PTT members create or receive are not Federal or Presidential records,
but are considered private materials."
Yet Mueller seems to have ignored the law. Without a warrant or
subpoena, his team of lawyers brazenly demanded these private records
from the General Services Administration (GSA) which held custody of the
materials. The GSA does this as a service to all incoming presidents out
of courtesy, but it neither owns the documents nor is authorized to
release them to anyone under any circumstances because they are deemed
entirely private.
If true, Mueller's conduct is not only unethical and improper, it
constitutes lawlessness. On this basis, he must be removed and replaced.
Counsel for the Trump Transition Team has sent a letter to Congress
alleging the Fourth Amendment was violated in "failing to obtain a
warrant for the search or seizure of private property in which the owner
has a reasonable expectation of privacy (Coolidge v. New Hampshire, 403
U.S. 443, 489)."
Mueller might contest the claim of an unlawful seizure because the GSA
willingly handed over the documents, but this disregards the fact that
the GSA broke the law and Mueller surely knew it when he pressured the
agency to do so.
Privileged Material
The most serious charge against Mueller is that he obtained, reviewed
and used material that is privileged.
For months, Mueller allegedly failed to disclose to the transition team
that he acquired these privileged documents. Under the law, he and his
lawyers are not entitled to possess or read any of them. Even worse, the
transition team says it warned the special counsel six months ago that
it had no right to access the records without gaining permission from
the PTT.
Courts have clearly stated what prosecutors are supposed to do under
these circumstances: "An attorney who receives privileged documents has
an ethical duty to cease review of the documents, notify the privilege
holder, and return the documents." (Arnold, 2004 U.S. Dist. Lexis 19381,
at 30.)
Did Mueller do this? Apparently not. He never notified PTT when his
staff of lawyers encountered the privileged documents and he compounded
his violation of the law by possessing and accessing them for months.
Only the owner of such materials can waive the privileged that protects
them. Since the GSA does not, under the law, own the records, only the
transition team can make such a waiver. It did not.
Hence, if any illegally obtained documents have been used in the
Trump-Russia case, then the results are tainted and invalid. This is a
well-established principle of law.
Mueller Must Be Removed
The use by Mueller of even one privileged document can, and must, result
in his disqualification from the case.
Courts have frequently used their supervisory authority to disqualify
prosecutors for obtaining materials protected by the attorney-client
privilege. (In re Grand Jury Proceedings John Doe #462, 757 F.2d600
Granger v Peyton, 379 F.2d 709, Arnold v. Cargill Inc., No. 01-2086,
2004 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 19381.)
Statutory law also demands Mueller's removal. Pursuant to 5 C.F.R.
2635.501, government employees, including prosecutors, are directed to
"take appropriate steps to avoid an appearance of loss of impartiality
in the performance of his or her official duties."
The lawyer for the Trump transition team states that the special
counsel's office admitted in a telephone conversation on Friday that it
failed to use an "ethical wall" or "taint team" to segregate any
privileged records. This is often done to keep them isolated from
lawyers and investigators involved in the case.
Yet, Mueller did not adopt such precautionary measures. Instead, he
apparently allowed his team to utilize the documents while questioning
witnesses in the Trump-Russia case.
If true, Mueller's conduct is not only unethical and improper, it
constitutes lawlessness. On this basis, he must be removed and replaced.
Given the insular nature of the special counsel operation, it is
reasonable to conclude that all the lawyers and investigators likely
accessed the privileged documents. Therefore, not just Mueller, but his
entire team must be dismissed. This would include Deputy Attorney
General Rod Rosenstein who oversees the case.
Either Congress should take aggressive action or the Presidential
Transition Team (now Trump for America, Inc.) must petition a federal
judge to order their removal.
The integrity of the special counsel probe has been deeply compromised
by numerous allegations of corrupt acts. In its current composition, it
seems beyond repair.
The original version of this column incorrectly cited a case called
"Taylor." The correct case name is "Arnold." A revised citation appears
above. Additionally, the Finn case was incorrectly quoted. Additional
cases have been cited in support for clarification. |
|