It's both a beautiful and
horrific thing to witness the exposure of what seems to be horrible
corruption at one of America's most important institutions - the Federal
Bureau of Investigation.
The beautiful part of
what is taking place is we are witnessing the rooting out of many
corrupt players among a field of thousands of high-character men and
women who serve on the front lines of investigating federal level crime
and terrorism. No other agency has been given such a solemn
responsibility as the FBI. Most do their jobs right and without
preference to their political tilts. That is not true with everyone.
On the horrific side of
the equation, it seems for 18 months now, the FBI has been fixated on
determining whether President Trump worked with Russia to influence the
2016 election without any type of check or balance upon its efforts.
Many have called this effort the greatest witch hunt since the
Salem Massachusetts folks went a bit haywire in the 1600s burning people
at the stake who they thought were practicing sorcery.
Recent email and text
message revelations between several top FBI agents suggest that the only
meddling in the 2016 Presidential election was by the FBI more than
anything hatched in halls of the Kremlin in Moscow.
Our American judicial
system is illustrated by a blind-folded woman holding two scales in her
hand illustrating that true justice is actually blind, meaning EVERYONE
is to be treated equally and fairly under the LAW, no matter how rich
and powerful they may be. The law the janitor at Food City must follow
is the same law the President of the United States must follow - or the
former Secretary of State.
There is strong evidence
that an insidious plot unprecedented in American history was hatched
within the FBI and the Obama Justice Department to help elect Hillary
Clinton and defeat Donald Trump last year. Yet when this apparent
effort to improperly influence the election backfired and President
Trump won, the suspected conspirators appear to have employed a
fraudulent investigation of him in an attempt to undo the election
results and remove him as president.
This was not some “deep state,” conspiracy theory movie. This was being
played out by FBI Special Agent Peter Strzok and FBI lawyer Lisa Page,
both of whom sought to impose their own political views on government
policy in defiance of democratically elected leadership. Those
things come directly from the Communist manifesto of Karl Marx.
Furthermore, this blatant plot to keep Trump from becoming
president and to weaken and potentially pave the way for his impeachment
with a prolonged politically motivated investigation is not only
corrupt, it's down right dangerous to every law abiding citizen in this
nation. What was done subverted the electoral democracy itself in
our country.
Now, the mainstream media and Democrats may dismiss any talk of an
anti-Trump conspiracy by the FBI and Justice Department as right-wing
nonsense. Before what took place this week came to light they mocked it
all as paranoid fantasies of Trump supporters with no basis in facts.
But after Wednesday's
revelations of the texts between Strzok and Page, there are plenty of
facts that lay out a two-part, and most damning case of corruption of
the one agency that is sworn to the protection of the citizens of the
United States.
The first arm was rooted
in efforts to devise a way to exonerate former Secretary of State
Hillary Clinton who committed crimes under the Espionage Act in her
mishandling of classified documents on her private email server.
Yet, absolving Clinton of any wrong doing cleared the way for her to
continue her candidacy at a time when all polls and just about every
pundit predicted she would be elected president in November 2016. If
Clinton had been charged with crimes she would likely have been forced
to drop her candidacy, and if she remained in the race her candidacy
would have been doomed.
But that part of the anti-Trump plot was not enough.
A back-up plan would be
prudent. It seems the Obama Justice Department and FBI conjured up a
second plan or as one of the text messages said "an insurance policy,"
if the first stratagem failed.
This is the part that is
the most malevolent – manufacturing an alleged crime supposedly
committed by Trump where no crime exists in the law.
Armed with a fictitious
justification, a criminal investigation was launched into so-called
Trump-Russia “collusion.” It was always a mythical legal claim, since
there is no statute prohibiting foreign nationals from volunteering
their services in American political campaigns. More importantly,
there was never and has never been a scintilla of evidence that Trump
collaborated with Russia to influence the election. None!
It was working for a
while until recent revelations began to cause the Democrats' strategy to
crumble down on themselves and boomerang into something they are running
to the hills for to hide from!
The text messages exchanged between Strzok and Page, who, despite both
being married, were romantically involved, confirm a stunning hostility
toward Trump, calling him an “idiot” and “loathsome.” In other
exchanges, they called Trump an "enormous do-che," and said "this man
cannot be president."
When not berating Trump, they were praising Hillary Clinton. In one
text, Strzok said: "God Hillary should win 100,000,000-0." In another,
he said that "a lot of people are holding their breath hoping" about
Clinton.
When Hillary accepted the party's nomination in July, Strzok texted
"Congrats on a woman nominated for President in a major party! About
damn time!" During one of the presidential debates, he texted: "Oh hot
damn. HRC is throwing down saying Trump in bed with Russia." In one of
Page's texts, she said Hillary "just has to win now."
Then there was the one text between Strzok and Page dated Aug. 6, 2016
that reeks even more clearly of the depths these Clinton loving
adulterers were willing to go to ensure President Trump would not be
elected, and if he was elected, not stay in office long. (On a side
note, you ever notice in politics more than anywhere else birds of a
feather flock together. I guess if the Clintons are your idol you'd
follow Bill's example of sexual misconduct with other people's wives)
From Page: “And maybe you’re meant to stay where you are because you’re
meant to protect the country from that menace.” (This is clearly a
reference to a Trump presidency).
Strzok: “Thanks. And of course I’ll try and approach it that way. I can
protect our country at many levels .…”
It is reasonable to conclude that Strzok had already taken steps to
“protect” the country from what he considered would be a dangerous and
harmful Trump presidency.
Just one month earlier, then-FBI Director James Comey had announced he
would recommend that no criminal charges be filed by the Justice
Department against Clinton. Given all the incriminating evidence against
Clinton, Comey’s view that she should not be prosecuted made no sense by
any objective standard.
This is where Strzok played a pivotal role. As the lead investigator in
the Clinton email case, he is the person who changed the critical
wording in Comey’s description of Clinton’s handling of classified
material, substituting “extremely careless” for “gross negligence.”
Legal experts all agree that the alteration of two words had enormous
consequences, because it allowed Clinton to evade prosecution. This
removed the only legal impediment to her election as president.
Now if these two
assholes, pardon the language, were just two adulterous FBI agents
passing love notes in study hall it'd be one thing. The problem is they
were far more just a couple of bureaucrats crunching numbers in a
windowless office at the Bureau of Justice Statistics.
Strzok was a key player
in the FBI's entire investigation into whether Clinton had broken the
law by using a private, unsecured email server to handle highly
classified documents. He interviewed several of the people involved,
including Clinton herself.
He was also the person who watered down the language in the statement
used by Comey to exonerate Clinton, changing it from "gross negligence"
to "extremely careless," which as we noted in this space was critical to
Comey's claim that Clinton didn't break any laws.
As Strzok was busy
airbrushing Clinton's email he knew had the FBI done the right thing and
indicted her for putting national security at risk, it would have
crushed her campaign. He couldn't have that happen because it would mean
it would help the man Strzok despised get elected president.
In South Georgia
language Strzok had motive, means and opportunity to sabotage that
investigation.
Both Strzok and Page were also deeply involved in the FBI's
investigation into the alleged Russia meddling claim, which started
almost immediately after Comey let Clinton off the hook, and was sparked
by a dodgy Clinton-financed "dossier." In fact, according to CNN, Strzok
signed the document making the Russia probe official.
As more texts have been
revealed since Wednesday, the evidence has grown more damning and points
to the highest levels of the FBI.
According to reports, Strzok texted Page saying that while he wanted to
believe "that there's no way he gets elected" he was "afraid we can't
take that risk," then added cryptically that "it's like an insurance
policy." The text doesn't make clear what the "it" was, but does suggest
the topic was discussed with the Deputy FBI Director Andrew McCabe.
In August, Page told
Strzok he should stay where he is because "you're meant to protect the
country from that menace," meaning Trump. She then sent a link to a
David Brooks column in The New York Times which argued that, with Trump,
"There comes a time when neutrality and laying low become dishonorable.
If you're not in revolt, you're in cahoots." To which Strzok said "of
course I'll try to approach it that way … I can protect our country at
many levels."
Days after the election,
Page texted to say she bought "All the President's Men,'' a book about
Nixon's demise from the Watergate scandal, because "I needed to brush up
on Watergate.''
One of the texts also
suggests that both knew they should be careful when discussing Clinton.
In April 2016, Page texted "you say we text on that phone when we talk
about Hillary because it can't be traced."
Strzok: “I want to
believe the path you threw out for consideration in Andy’s (McCabe)
office – that there’s no way he gets elected – but I’m afraid we can’t
take that risk. It’s like an insurance policy in the unlikely event you
die before you’re 40.…”
The reference to “Andy” McCabe, who was also supervising the
investigation of Clinton’s emails at the same time his wife was
receiving roughly $675,000 in campaign money in her race for elective
office in Virginia from groups aligned with Clinton.
What was the “insurance policy” discussed in Andy’s office? Was it the
FBI’s investigation of Trump and his associates? Or was it the
anti-Trump “dossier” that may have been used by the FBI and the Justice
Department as the basis for a warrant to wiretap and spy on Trump
associates? Perhaps it was both.
It was also Strzok who
interviewed the now indicted Michael Flynn in January. Many experts
believe Strzok intentionally did not inform Flynn his conversation with
the FBI was on the record seeking to entrap him for what eventually took
place in November when he was indicted for lying to the FBI under
Mueller's probe.
If I'm Michael Flynn's
lawyer, I'm calling for a complete dismissal of these charges NOW on the
basis that Mr. Flynn's rights were violated in not giving him due
process to an attorney before speaking to a federal officer about a
criminal matter. There are indications Flynn was not aware the FBI was
recording his answers as those under oath. Had Flynn been told the truth
he is likely a free man today! What makes this more than grotesque is
that Hillary Clinton was NEVER put under oath during her testimony last
summer when she quietly walked into FBI headquarters to speak about the
emails. I do wish I had been a fly on that wall that day.
Strzok's punishment for
all of this has been a joke. New FBI Christopher Wray simply demoted him
to a pencil pushing job in personnel for his actions.
McCabe is likely going
to join him there soon.
BOTH THESE MEN NEEDED TO
BE FIRED AND CHARGED WITH CRIMES THEMSELVES!!!!!!
The disgust over this
moves then to Jeff Sessions our illustrious Attorney General who has
been the biggest disappointment since the fourth quarter Atlanta Falcons
of Super Bowl 50.
Sessions oversees the
FBI as Attorney General yet has allowed this corrupt circus to go on
without stepping in and doing something to stop it to his eternal shame
by outsourcing the integrity of the Justice Department to one Rod
Rosenstein, who himself is neck deep in corruption and Clinton ties.
Mueller's "team" has
been shown to be nothing more than a group neck deep in Clinton
corruption period.
Rosenstein was given oversight of Mueller’s investigation when the
Attorney General recused himself in one of the biggest blunders by any
AG ever!. Even a left-leaning panel of judges said last week Sessions
was well within his rights to meet with the Russian diplomat after the
election as part of President Trump's transition team. Instead Sessions
got punked and intimidated by Trump hating Democrats into thinking if he
oversaw the Russia investigation he'd be impartial. How about a better
word of what he truly is now - "failure."
Rosenstein previously
supervised an investigation into the approval by the Obama
administration of a controversial sale of an American company now known
as Uranium One to Russia. At the time Hillary Clinton was secretary of
State.
Russia used bribery, kickbacks, and extortion to influence the uranium
deal. During negotiations, Bill Clinton was paid $500,000 to speak in
Russia, and the chairman of Uranium One made a $2.35 million donation to
the Clinton Foundation. Despite these glaring concerns, the FBI quietly
ended the case in 2015 under Rosenstein's leadership and direction.
Another player in this
is Andrew Weissmann, former chief of the Justice Department
Criminal Fraud Section and a former partner at Wilmer Hale. He attended
Hillary Clinton’s election night party, and praised then-Acting Attorney
General Sally Yates, who defied President Trump by not enforcing his
travel ban. An email from Weissmann's own DOJ account indicated that he
was "so proud" of her for defying Trump. Weissmann is one of Mueller’s
top deputies and has a proven track record of reckless prosecution with
some of his antics leading the Supreme Court to throw out entire cases.
The problem is the
damage was done to corporations which in turn damaged and ruined the
lives of thousands of people.
Another Mueller team member, Aaron Zebley, chief of staff for then-FBI
Director Mueller, former partner at WilmerHale represented Justin
Cooper, who set up Hillary Clinton’s private server.
Just how disturbing is Zebely’s employment for Mueller’s witch hunt?
Cooper admitted to two instances where he destroyed Hillary Clinton’s
old mobile devices by breaking them in half or hitting them with a
hammer.
Jeannie Rhee, former partner at WilmerHale, represented ex-Obama Deputy
National Security Adviser Ben Rhodes, the Clinton Foundation in a 2015
racketeering case, and Hillary Clinton herself in a lawsuit seeking
access to her private emails. Rhee was hired by Mueller to serve on his
witch hunt.
Then there is Associate Deputy Attorney General Bruce G. Ohr. Before we
get to Bruce G. Ohr we would be wise to discuss first the Trump dossier
upon which 100% of Mueller's existence seems to have sprung from to
begin with.
The “dossier” was a compendium of largely specious allegations about
Trump, compiled by the opposition research firm Fusion GPS. The dossier
was funded by the Clinton campaign and the Democratic National
Committee. Comey called it “salacious and unverified.”
Evidently not salacious
and unverified enough since it wound up in the hands of two FBI agents
who used it to do corrupt and legal things with. Rumors have been out
there that Sen. John McCain (R-AZ) was the go between that received the
report from Fusion and turned it over initially to the FBI, and likely
Strzok himself.
Various congressional committees suspect the dossier was illegally used
to place a Trump campaign associate, Carter Page, under foreign
surveillance. When asked about that on Wednesday during a hearing on
Capitol Hill, Deputy Attorney General Rod Rosenstein refused to answer,
which sounds like an implicit “yes.”
Using a dubious, if not phony, document in support of an affidavit to
obtain a warrant from a federal judge constitutes a fraud upon the
court, which is a crime.
Ohr’s wife worked for Fusion GPS. This created a disqualifying conflict
of interest for Mr. Ohr. He was legally obligated under Justice
Department regulations to recuse himself from the Mueller investigation
of Russia’s role in the election, but he did not. Ohr's punishment was
demotion again and not firing. Pathetic.
Congress needs to find out whether the dossier was exploited as a
pretext for initiating the Russia probe against President Trump. It
would also be unconscionable, if not illegal, for the FBI and Justice
Department to use opposition research funded by Clinton’s campaign to
spy on her opponent or his campaign.
Both agencies have been resisting congressional subpoenas and other
demands for answers, which smacks of a cover-up. Since the Justice
Department cannot be trusted to investigate itself, a second special
counsel should be appointed.
Furthermore, Sessions
needs to again get off his ass and put himself back in charge of the
Department President Trump hired him to oversee!! It's infuriating to
see Sessions outsourcing his responsibility to Trump hating officials
who have no check and balance on their actions!!!
The Clinton email case
needs to be reopened and the conduct of Strzok, Page, Comey, and others
who may have obstructed justice by exonerating Clinton in the face of
substantial evidence that she had committed crimes should be
investigated and investigated NOW.
If Strzok or anyone else allowed their political views to shape the
investigations of either Clinton or Trump and dictate the outcomes, that
is a felony for which they should be prosecuted.
Let me ask the most
important question of the day concerning all of this. What would have
happened had this been done in 2008 with then incoming President Barrack
Obama and say former President George W. Bush or John McCain were behind
efforts to spy on Obama? We don't have the vocabulary to tell you what
would have happened.
The Mueller
investigation is now so tainted with the appearance of corruption that
it has lost credibility and the public’s trust.
The left, the Democrats,
the Lame Stream Media, and liberal commentators can spin this travesty
of justice all they want. They are the ones who opened this can of worms
in the first place are responsible for the way it boomeranged into a can
of something we term in the south "whip-ass" on themselves.
It's actually been
popcorn worthy to watch. It will more popcorn worthy if those in power
will do their jobs and see that those involved are FIRED and REMOVED
from public office, not sent to the basement to scheme more corruption
down the road!
I'm just waiting for the
orange jumpsuits to make an appearance and I'm not talking "Project
Runway." I'm talking the Clinton Foundation, Hillary Clinton herself,
Eric Holder, Barrack Obama, Loretta Lynch, Bill Clinton, James Comey,
Peter Strzok, Lisa Page, the Ohrs, and others.
This would be a great
start. Let the draining of the swamp continue!
|