Mueller Aide Fired For Anti-Trump Texts
To Mistress Under Review For Role In Clinton Email Investigation
EXCLUSIVE – Two senior Justice
Department officials have confirmed to Fox News that the department's
Office of Inspector General is reviewing the role played in the Hillary
Clinton email investigation by Peter Strzok, a former deputy director
for counterintelligence at the FBI who was removed from the staff of
Special Counsel Robert S. Mueller III earlier this year, after Mueller
learned that Strzok had exchanged anti-Trump texts with a colleague.
A source close to the matter said the OIG probe, which will examine
Strzok's roles in a number of other politically sensitive cases, should
be completed by "very early next year."
The task will be exceedingly complex, given Strzok's consequential
portfolio. He participated in the FBI's fateful interview with Hillary
Clinton on July 2, 2016 – just days before then-FBI Director James Comey
announced he was declining to recommend prosecution of Mrs. Clinton in
connection with her use, as secretary of state, of a private email
server.
As deputy FBI director for counterintelligence, Strzok also enjoyed
liaison with various agencies in the intelligence community, including
the CIA, then led by Director John Brennan.
Key figure
House investigators told Fox News they have long regarded Strzok as a
key figure in the chain of events when the bureau, in 2016, received the
infamous anti-Trump "dossier" and launched a counterintelligence
investigation into Russian meddling in the election that ultimately came
to encompass FISA surveillance of a Trump campaign associate.
The "dossier" was a compendium of salacious and largely unverified
allegations about then-candidate Trump and others around him that was
compiled by the opposition research firm Fusion GPS. The firm's bank
records, obtained by House investigators, revealed that the project was
funded by the Clinton campaign and the Democratic National Committee.
House Intelligence Committee Chairman Devin Nunes, R-Calif., has sought
documents and witnesses from the Department of Justice and FBI to
determine what role, if any, the dossier played in the move to place a
Trump campaign associate under foreign surveillance.
Strzok himself briefed the committee on
Dec. 5, 2016, the sources said, but within months of that session House
Intelligence Committee investigators were contacted by an informant
suggesting that there was “documentary evidence” that Strzok was
purportedly obstructing the House probe into the dossier.
In early October, Nunes personally asked Deputy Attorney General Rod
Rosenstein – who has overseen the Trump-Russia probe since the recusal
of Attorney General Jeff Sessions – to make Strzok available to the
committee for questioning, sources said.
While Strzok’s removal from the Mueller team had been publicly reported
in August, the Justice Department never disclosed the anti-Trump texts
to the House investigators. The denial of access to Strzok was instead
predicated, sources said, on broad "personnel" grounds.
When a month had elapsed, House investigators – having issued three
subpoenas for various witnesses and documents – formally recommended to
Nunes that DOJ and FBI be held in contempt of Congress. Nunes continued
pressing DOJ, including a conversation with Rosenstein as recently as
last Wednesday.
That turned out to be 12 days after DOJ and FBI had made Strzok
available to the Senate Intelligence Committee, which is conducting its
own parallel investigation into the allegations of collusion between the
Trump campaign and the Kremlin.
Contempt citations?
Responding to the revelations about Strzok’s texts on Saturday, Nunes
said he has now directed his staff to draft contempt-of-Congress
citations against Rosenstein and the new FBI director, Christopher Wray.
Unless DOJ and FBI comply with all of his outstanding requests for
documents and witnesses by the close of business on Monday, Nunes said,
he would seek a resolution on the contempt citations before year’s end.
“We now know why Strzok was dismissed, why the FBI and DOJ refused to
provide us this explanation, and at least one reason why they previously
refused to make [FBI] Deputy Director [Andrew] McCabe available to the
Committee for an interview,” Nunes said in a statement.
"We now know why Strzok was dismissed, why the FBI and DOJ refused to
provide us this explanation, and at least one reason why they previously
refused to make [FBI] Deputy Director [Andrew] McCabe available to the
Committee for an interview."
- House Intelligence Committee Chairman Devin Nunes, R-Calif.
Early Saturday afternoon, after Strzok’s texts were cited in published
reports by the New York Times and the Washington Post – and Fox News had
followed up with inquiries about the department’s refusal to make Strzok
available to House investigators – the Justice Department contacted the
office of House Speaker Paul Ryan to establish a date for Strzok’s
appearance before House Intelligence Committee staff, along with two
other witnesses long sought by the Nunes team.
Those witnesses are FBI Deputy Director Andrew McCabe and the FBI
officer said to have handled Christopher Steele, the British spy who
used Russian sources to compile the dossier for Fusion GPS. The official
said to be Steele’s FBI handler has also appeared already before the
Senate panel.
The Justice Department maintained that the decision to clear Strzok for
House interrogation had occurred a few hours prior to the appearance of
the Times and Post stories.
In addition, Rosenstein is set to testify before the House Judiciary
Committee on Dec. 13.
The Justice Department maintains that it has been very responsive to the
House intel panel's demands, including private briefings for panel staff
by senior DOJ and FBI personnel and the production of several hundred
pages of classified materials available in a secure reading room at DOJ
headquarters on Oct. 31.
Behind the scenes
Sources said Speaker Ryan has worked quietly behind the scenes to try to
resolve the clash over dossier-related evidence and witnesses between
the House intel panel on the one hand and DOJ and FBI on the other. In
October, however, the speaker took the unusual step of saying publicly
that the two agencies were "stonewalling" Congress.
All parties agree that some records being sought by the Nunes team
belong to categories of documents that have historically never been
shared with the committees that conduct oversight of the intelligence
community.
Federal officials told Fox News the requested records include “highly
sensitive raw intelligence,” so sensitive that officials from foreign
governments have emphasized to the U.S. the “potential danger and
chilling effect” it could place on foreign intelligence sources.
Justice Department officials noted that Nunes did not appear for a
document-review session that his committee’s ranking Democrat, U.S. Rep.
Adam Schiff, D-Calif., attended, and once rejected a briefing by an FBI
official if the panel’s Democratic members were permitted to attend.
Sources close to the various investigations agreed the discovery of
Strzok’s texts raised important questions about his work on the Clinton
email case, the Trump-Russia probe, and the dossier matter.
“That’s why the IG is looking into all of those things,” a Justice
Department official told Fox News on Saturday.
A top House investigator asked: “If Mueller knew about the texts, what
did he know about the dossier?”
Peter Carr, a spokesman for the special counsel, said: “Immediately upon
learning of the allegations, the Special Counsel’s Office removed Peter
Strzok from the investigation.”
Carr declined to comment on the extent to which Mueller has examined the
dossier and its relationship, if any, to the counterintelligence
investigation that Strzok launched during the height of the campaign
season.
James Rosen joined FOX News Channel (FNC) in 1999 and is the network’s
chief Washington correspondent.
Jake Gibson is a producer working at the Fox News Washington bureau who
covers politics, law enforcement and intelligence issues.