Whenever there is controversy in
stories circling in media, the trained psychology professional will look
at motive. Motive can illuminate a lot when evidence is missing, and
that is why even courts consider motive so strongly.
On President Trump's call to fallen soldier La David Johnson's wife, the
president's motives are important...
Either the president called to wish the wife well, and to give her
America's condolences, or the president called to antagonize a fallen
soldier's wife.
When you consider the motive of the accuser, Congresswoman Frederica
Wilson, D-Fla., there is a long history of evidence that could be
considered to point to her motive to bring down this president.
Logic dictates that the president wouldn't simultaneously make a call to
console and hurt a grieving military wife. It simply doesn't make sense.
But more importantly, fame is a great motivator. Most Americans, if
surveyed, would say that they have never heard of Congresswoman Wilson
before now, despite her many attempts to throw outlandish accusations at
President Trump. There is a history of attention-getting behavior that
has not worked. (For instance, she has repeatedly called for Trump's
impeachment and has called him mentally ill.)
For those desperately seeking attention, when their tactics to fill
their appetite for attention don't work, they seldom give up.
Ordinarily, they take it to a new level.
When the Congresswoman was privy to part of a conversation she could
exploit for her well-documented purpose of getting attention on the back
of the president, she may have seen this as her ticket to her fifteen
minutes of fame.
Since she made the accusation that the president said that fallen
soldier Johnson "knew what he signed up for" (as if somehow insinuating
that he deserved death for his decision), she has had a lot of
attention.
The only problem: The motivations don't add up in her favor.
Her history of desperate, attention-seeking tactics, using the
president, present an illuminating case in favor of the president.
Logic dictates that the president wouldn't simultaneously make a call to
console and hurt a grieving military wife. It simply doesn't make sense.
News media is adept at looking at the "what" in situations like that.
For behavioral junkies like me, when one stops to look deeper, into the
"why" of any situation, it almost always provides clarity.
Dr. Gina Loudon is a frequent commentator on the interplay of psychology
and politics on FOX News properties. She is a member of the President's
Media Advisory Board, and was a delegate to the National Republican
Convention for Donald J. Trump. Her book, Mad Politics, is set to
release before the Midterm elections. She offers frequent psychological,
political, and social commentary. |
|