A court decision that
opens the doors of Culbertson Elementary School in Pennsylvania to books
about witches – but rejects the Bible as being too “proselytizing” – is
being challenged.
The Arizona-based Alliance Defense Fund has submitted amicus briefs in a
lawsuit filed when a kindergarten student, under an assignment in which
parents were invited to read their child’s favorite book, was denied
permission to have his mother read a Bible story.
A decision in U.S. District Court that sided with the school’s decision
to ban the Bible reading, while allowing teachers to suggest reading
books about “witches and Halloween,” effectively “sounds the death knell
for religious freedom in public schools,” the ADF argues.
“By transmuting private
religious speech into government speech, granting school officials carte
blanche authority to determine what religious speech is ‘too religious,’
and holding that a school’s desire to avoid a perceived Establishment
Clause violation justifies viewpoint discrimination, the lower court’s
opinion permits a blatant violation of the Constitution,” the group
said.
“The school’s decision to ban religious speech is nothing more than
blatant viewpoint discrimination,” said ADF Legal Counsel Jeremy
Tedesco. “This was not about proselytizing anyone,” continued ADF Senior
Legal Counsel David Cortman. “It was about letting students tell the
class about what things are important to them, and the Bible is
important to this student.”
The classroom assignment was called “All About Me,” and was intended to
provide an opportunity for children to “identify individual interests
and learn about others,” the ADF said. The activity at the school –
which lists an unspecified “religious holiday” in September but a
“winter recess” in December – allowed students to talk about their
interests through the use of their favorite stuffed animals, posters,
snacks and games and books.
When his turn came, Culbertson Elementary student Wesley Busch asked his
mother to read from his favorite book, the Bible. But the ADF said
school officials told Donna Kay Busch that the school viewed the Bible
as “proselytizing” and as “promoting a specific religious point of
view,” banning it from the class.
Officials with the Marple Newtown School District had defended their
actions as reasonable, and the trial court judge agreed.
However, the ADF’s brief argued “the lower court’s radical departure
from settled First Amendment law poses a serious threat to religious
expression.”
The brief noted that the school allowed discussion of religion in the
“All About Me” assignment. “Because Wesley liked to go to church, he
created a poster that included a picture of a church with the words, ‘I
like to go to church’ below it. This poster was displayed on the wall.”
But the Bible reading Wesley requested was rejected because the Bible
promotes “a specific religious point of view” and the teacher instead
suggested Wesley’s mother “read a book ‘about witches and Halloween’
instead.”
The ADF said the district court erred in assuming that such private
speech would be attributed to the school.
“Indeed, the Bible reading at issue in this case is Wesley’s speech: his
mother came to the class at his request, to read his book selection, so
that he could share himself with his classmates,” the ADF said.
The filing also noted the dangers the district court ruling left in its
wake.
“The lower court presumes that certain religious speech – i.e.,
religious speech that crosses some indeterminate threshold where it
becomes ‘too religious’ – automatically violates the Establishment
Clause and thus may constitutionally be censored. This holding is plain
legal error under controlling precedent. Moreover, it impermissibly
interjects government officials into the affairs and doctrines of
religion.”
Read more at http://www.wnd.com/2007/08/43289/#y49OXbTPQGSZgPEO.99
|
|