The motto of the state of Maine is Dirigo
– Latin for ‘I lead’. Bellwether wants to know who’s leading the fight
to protect little girls in Maine from genital mutilation.
A Republican-sponsored bill to outlaw the barbaric procedure is being
opposed by Democrats, who say they fear it will offend the cultural
sensitivity of the approximately 10,000 Somalis living in the state. But
there’s an uglier, more malevolent reason lurking behind the scenes.
Female genital mutilation – in which a young girl’s clitoris is cut out
and her vagina stitched closed – is commonly practiced in Somalia, where
it is estimated 90 percent of the female population has undergone the
ritual. The intention is to ensure that girls remain chaste until they
are married, and that they derive no pleasure from sexual activity.
With the arrival over the past several years of thousands of Somali
refugees and asylum seekers in Maine, the tradition of FGM also crossed
the ocean. So-called “cutters”, who are usually female midwives, often
perform the procedure without anesthesia and with dirty razor blades.
Some victims suffer from urinary tract problems as a result.
“I had never heard of it, when someone first brought to my attention
that it could be happening here,” says state Rep. Heather Sirocki, a
Republican. “I said, ‘You’re kidding me, right?’” Once she was convinced
it was no joke, Sirocki introduced legislation to ban genital mutilation
in Maine. Such was her initial naïveté, she thought the bill would pass
unanimously.
Then came an avalanche of criticism from progressive groups like the
American Civil Liberties Union and immigrant aid organizations, who
argue that it is not the state’s role to interfere with cultural
traditions that run counter to American values.
“I believe they are more afraid of offending someone than they are in
protecting little girls,” says Sirocki. “We believe the immigrant
population is vulnerable. I want to get this done this year.” That’s
because Sirocki is a four-term member of the House, and by Maine law,
cannot run again for re-election next year.
No one in the legislature is openly defending FGM – that might turn off
even the most liberal Mainers. Democrats contend that child protection
laws already on the books are sufficient, and that singling out genital
mutilation would be disrespectful of the Somalis’ cultural inheritance.
Sirocki says she was stunned by that argument.
She was in for an even bigger shock when a Democrat, who supports the
bill, approached her. As Sirocki tells it, “She said to me, ‘Heather,
you know how when a member of our party submits a bill, Republicans kill
it simply because a Democrat submitted it? That’s what’s happening
here.’”
Then it got even worse. By Sirocki’s account, Democratic Rep. Barbara
Cardone of Bangor, who opposes the bill, said she would wait until next
year, when Sirocki was out of office, then submit the bill in her own
name, so that Democrats would get credit for protecting children.
When I asked Cardone about that meeting, she told me: “I don’t know that
it will be the same bill. I will propose a criminal bill. And it’s so I
can say that I’m going to address this. I’m not doing it because I want
a Democratic victory.”
“I don’t know if they’re telling the truth,” Sirocki said of the
opposition party. “They’re not known for that.”
Sirocki says what she learned about FGM as she prepared the bill exposed
her to things she’d just as soon not know. “I’m trying to stay focused
on the law making it illegal. When you actually think about what’s
happening to these girls, it’s just so horrible.”
Equally horrible is blocking a common-sense law when it might save young
girls from lifelong disfigurement for political reasons.
John Moody is Executive Vice President, Executive Editor for Fox News. A
former Rome bureau chief for Time magazine, he is the author of four
books including "Pope John Paul II : Biography."
|
|